Using Curtains For Closet

homeland security is a priority of this country


From Release of Friday, February 26, 2010
homeland security is a priority of this country

Italy is a country that has often incomparable natural beauty with those of other areas of the world. A heritage that is being gradually but increasingly depleted of bad policy choices made by the ignoble and mingling with the business committee, the lobby of the cement and the gangs are always ready to play havoc with the area just to make money. An evil plot that wallows and feeds on the mafia bourgeoisie. Italy is in fact also the country where 70% of is common to geological risk, as confirmed by the Environment Report 2010 recently presented by Italy Legambiente.
The landslides and natural disasters, partly because of climatic changes are a major priority of the political agenda not only at national and local levels. Unfortunately, they also raise appetites jackals, as was also the case with the Eagle of the earthquake.
In Italy for decades the landslides, mudslides and floods in particular, resulting in huge loss of life and frequent destruction of settlements, infrastructure, and cultural activities in the territory. The prevention and management should therefore be a priority political agenda. The considerable financial resources to public expenditure in recent years have not actually managed to reduce the risks. This demonstrates the serious structural weaknesses of the management of territories and especially the lack of action in a state of emergency and is perhaps due in particular, as we're seeing clearly now, the clear political will to act in an emergency, so as to circumvent the rules and to use the most expeditious methods for handling affairs without red tape. All this even at the cost of higher payments and lower quality control on the legality of actions and decisions. And all the above without much more far-sighted policy planning rehabilitation and prevention of hydrogeological underway. Tap
policy put an end to poor urban settlements, to poor management of river basins, the weakness of the fight against deforestation and industrial pollution. How
Federation of the Left in the regions where we are going to govern as well as in those where we will be in opposition, then we must be able to implement proposals on regional policies relating to hydrogeological and keep up the attention of governments premises on the problem, trying to avoid acting after yet another tragedy.
remember that we are talking about 5581 municipalities, representing 70 percent of the total, a potential high risk. Always as the Federation of the Left and as PRC, with our clubs and our activists, we must therefore be the sentinels, antennas ready to pick up the signals of failure to monitor the area, report, denounce, to propose solutions in terms of numbers to be allocated.
From 1998 to 2007 spending on the rehabilitation of areas affected by major flooding was over 10 billion euro. A 2003 estimate made by the Ministry of Environment quantified in 43 billion euro funds necessary to secure the areas identified at risk landslides and floods. Undersecretary Bertolaso \u200b\u200bafter the tragedy that struck the Messina spoke of 25 billion, while its fellow government Altero Matteoli quantified them in 35. In short, even by the executive on this serious issue made up their minds.
The fact remains that addressing the problem are enormous resources that are not found with the proclamations or the spectacular. You might think, however, such as removing them from the many works unnecessary and disastrous for the area that the current government tries to carry on.
It 's time to say enough to the tragedies announced. Sarno, Soverato, Versilia, and more recently Giampilieri Zanclea ladder and, in the minds of the Italians appear as synonyms of avoidable tragedies. These tragic events are evidence that the safety of the area is one of the priorities of this country, the truly great public work to which direct resources, skills, projects and investments.
The tragedies serve at least as a warning for the future. You will not have to repeat similar environmental disasters. We therefore strongly points to a public intervention that focuses on a firm commitment on the side of the landslide risk and soil conservation.

Maria Campese
National Secretariat Manager Prc
Dept. Environment, Land and Community Heritage

Knex Instructions. Example

No to the biomass power plant. Yes No GE on clean energy


The Federation of the Left, provincial coordination of Barletta-Andria-Trani, convened a conference on 08.02.2010 print on the assumptions of the construction of biomass power stations, with the presence of Maria Campese (National Secretary of the Communist Party of the re-founding - member National Council of the Federation of the left) and Sergio Evangelista, Provincial Council of the Federation of the Left.
of the possibility of building a 4 plant biomass in the only territory of the BAT (over 400 are those required at regional level) The evangelical counsel has voted in favor of the agenda presented to the Provincial Council, which affirmed the illegality of the route so far made for the approval of these plants, as is the Provincial Council of the Bat deliberative body in this regard. Beyond
of the process below, and Maria Campese, and Sergio Evangelista emphasized that:
• It is not clean energy. The emissions of the biomass power plant are extremely dangerous to humans, getting cancer and genetic damage. In this respect, there are studies and research, and so for those who might want to read up before making inferences on the safety of such installations.
• Even if emissions were zero, the raw material is not on site but must be imported from Africa and Asia, forcing the populations of those places to deforestation and cultivation of crops for the production of oils. In addition, the transport fuel would result in the pollution, pollution of the territories for road transport in tankers, waste of resources fossil fuels (fuel) for the operation of ships and trucks.
• The interest in building biomass power stations comes from government grants (taken from our pockets through the voice CIP6 billing), so high as to almost double the cost of building the plant, with a profit of almost 100% of capital invested (for example, on a construction cost of E 250 million, in a few years of contributions are paid E. 400 million). Not a bad deal!
• Plants of this nature affect irreversibly the agricultural economy, the tourism and agro-food areas of the health of citizens.
• The Apulia Region produces electricity in excess of their requirements, the energy that is not even entered all the electricity distribution network because that network, outdated, unable to absorb larger amount than that which already carries.
• In addition, these types of systems, from experience already lived in other places that have been installed, with time are transformed into real incinerators, which produce dioxins and other toxic substances, even with the specter of the 'waste emergency ".

OUR PROPOSAL
The Federation of the Left proposes that: • It uses the real
clean energy, the sun. It is implanted in all buildings: public, industrial and residential, photovoltaic panels (which generate electricity) and solar-thermal panels (which provide the heating-cooling and hot water). So by all citizens would no longer have to pay energy bills (electricity and gas), but rather may have a gain. Moreover, it would create employment opportunities for the extensive installation and maintenance of these facilities.
• What to start from the beginning an intensive campaign of information by inviting people to adopt a series of steps to save energy. It 'been shown that if all the lights of our appliances when not in use were off, across Italy it would save energy equivalent to the electricity production of the four nuclear power plants which the government said it would build.
• To avoid instrumental waste emergency, to start immediately an information campaign on the amount of waste (packaging, containers, ....) And is promoted throughout the collection with the 'door to door' with reuse, recovery and recycling of materials, with a substantial savings of resources and the ability to respond and workers. And 'demonstrated that for every work unit used in the incinerator if it takes 20 in collection' door to door '. There are now a number of municipalities that are approaching goal 'zero waste', for example Capannori.
• So a prudent environmental policy, sensitive to forms of energy used and based on policies of containment of waste, giving a strong employment response and are seamlessly combined to tourism and agro-food of our territories.
is not given to mayors and administrators of public ignorance. If you do not have skills you have a duty to inform and make consequential choices that safeguard the collective good, and not the interest of a few unscrupulous businessmen.
to start immediately a broad consultation of the public, informing them properly, instead of making choices, isolated, in secret rooms.

Barletta, February 8, 2010
Maria Campese

Gas Stations With Condoms In The Bathroom

No GM

concern that a ruling Council of State that, in fact, authorize the cultivation of corn in our area 810, the only GM product authorized for cultivation in Europe. That product, inter alia, was banned by many European Union countries such as Austria, Hungary, Germany, Greece and Luxembourg, according to the precautionary principle to protect the health of citizens. Upholding the action of FUTURAGRI, the association of farmers who want to grow corn, the administrative courts have ordered the Ministry 's Agriculture to conclude the process of finding and licensing the cultivation of genetically modified corn that has already been approved at EU level without awaiting the decision of the Regions on so-called coexistence plans, as is expected of routes drawn by the Legislative Decree 212 / 2001 the then Minister Gianni Alemanno. A ruling that must be tackled beyond the assurances of those hours of the Minister Zaia since it is known that the majority of the government in effect expresses a position and a culture in favor of GMOs. The opening of GMOs is a risk to public health, tracking of products, safety and food quality in order to safeguard biodiversity. It 'obvious that the production model toward which the' use of genetically modified organisms is the mortal enemy of our typical agricultural products of excellence in agriculture related to the history, culture, traditions of our country. It 's a further gift to the multinationals. One result that must be confronted and that, however, can hardly be stopped, if not take a point of view alternative to the dominant model, of capitalism, a point of view about a different model, other values, in which profit as an end in itself comes after the Environmental Quality, the assurance of public health, social justice. This result contrasts
you if you actually supports the Italian agriculture, especially small and medium-sized farms now in the grip of a suffocating crisis. It should create anti-crisis policies designed to block the auction of bankrupt companies, to freeze the debts of those contracts with banks and above all to create a plan for public investment in agriculture. Should encourage the development of increasingly short supply chain with clear advantages for the production quality and the environment, facilitating access to credit for small businesses. It should say especially appropriate policies and practice with the idea of \u200b\u200bfood sovereignty of each country. The next regional elections should be the occasion to establish clear plans and actions arising in this respect and affirm the strong opposition to the use of GMOs. We support the ongoing protests by farmers, many in recent times, who took over leadership and ability to make a political initiative to declare a state of emergency in the worst affected regions, to demand a moratorium on debt incurred by businesses, to reiterate the need for food sovereignty of each country and the quality of the productions. Mobilizations important because they tell us to an awareness of alternative to the neoliberal logic.

Maria Campese - National Secretariat - Head of National Environment, Land and Community Heritage Marchioni
James - Head of Agriculture and National Parks

B Blogger Raven Riley

Nuclear Campese (PRC): "Rather than focus on clean energy, the government confirmed the choice dangerous and costly" water


ROME - February 10 "A return to nuclear power is scientifically inconsistent, expensive and counter to the popular referendum of 1987. Unfortunately, today's decision is yet another demonstration that the government is serious and you start to take this path full of dire consequences for the community. " He said Maria Campese, the national secretariat of the PRC and Head of the Department of Environment, land and commons, in the light of the go-ahead given this morning by the Council of Ministers to the legislative decree that includes the criteria for the selection of locations in which will be born, nuclear power plants. It is - says Campese - a violation of minimum principles of democracy (it shows contempt for the referendum of 1987) and a return to a past of insecurity for citizens (accidents are on the agenda, the problem of waste not was never resolved). "Rather than focus on clean energy, renewable sources, which could be the focus of new jobs continues to play on the skin of citizens and workers. For these reasons, as the Federation of the Left, together with the citizens, committees and other political and social forces, we will construct the referendum that path will lead us to defeat the projects of the government and who is behind this operation ".

Maria Campese
Prc
National Secretariat (headed by Department of Land / Environment)

Does Hydroquinone Cause Dark Skin

public good event March 20 We do not stop!


Maria Campese *
We cried out of the water hands down, in the territories, the squares, in front of Parliament, institutions . However, it is not even big enough public outrage to stop the process of privatization of water contained in the decree "Save the case of" approved by Parliament in recent months. A measure that in fact imposes unfair to municipalities contracting for the management of public services in economic importance to private or joint venture if they participate in public procurement procedures.
We are fighting that has always been in favor of water as a common good, public management and against any attempt to privatize, we will not stop in front of the decisions taken by Parliament and issued by multinational water and a few unscrupulous speculator. Right after the green light to measure, such as the Federation of the Left and agree with the movement, we decided to conduct a series of actions and which may include construction, in January, three rounds of seminars on the theme of water, with the presence of his companions as speakers of the Forum of movements in defense of public water. It was three training sessions with which we were able to cover the whole country (Bologna, Rome and Bari) and which were attended by a total of 150 among comrades, many s of s which are present in local authorities. And there are many forms of action taken on local councils and in the joints and start to avoid falling into the trap of privatization, the submission of agendas in the deliberations to come, and in recent months, the meetings of the National Political Committee of the PRC Communist party had committed the institutional representatives of PRC legislation intended to promote the inclusion in the municipal statutes of specific wording to define the integrated water service as a public service free of local economic importance. Now
mobilization from below, we grown in recent months along with the awareness of the stakes, must continue and the water must be removed from the market logic at the expense of the community.
Water is one of the main constituents of ecosystems and is the basis of all known life forms and is fundamental in its various civilian uses, agricultural and industrial products. For Thales, the first philosopher of history, the water was the arche, the beginning of everything. These findings led him to observe what was around him. We are talking about 600 years before the birth of Christ. Today we know much more, that science and technology have provided further evidence of knowledge, a good so important, essential for life, for some is a commodity from which to draw the maximum profit.
The PRC has in its DNA, the battle in favor of common goods and to manage public water because it considers the common good, which is essential for life. Today on Earth more than a billion three hundred million people lack access to clean water. And for increasing numbers and are fed by neo-liberal choices that determine monstrous inequalities in access to even this good. The commercialization
, putting water in the hands of profit rates would also salty.
A public management, efficient and free search of profit at all costs, but is useful to the preservation of a community against the policies of plunder of the territories, protecting the landscape and the hydrological system. It requires measures that protect water resources to ensure a distribution of drinking water quality for all and requires an integrated management of water that includes the recycling and reuse, waste water treatment, waste water, especially for industrial uses. The reverse of the operation carried out by the government.
There are many reasons that lead us then to adhere firmly to the appeal launched by the Italian Forum of Water Movements and attend the great event to be held March 20 in Rome to confirm the rejection of the privatization of water and reaffirm that water is a common good.
The PRC and the Federation of the Left will be at the forefront of blocking any possibility of privatization, together with other political and social forces that share the referendum route. Communist Refoundation then puts its facilities available for the continuation of this important battle that will have a great time the first major event of the March 20 and soon after, with the process of collecting signatures that will from next April . * National Secretariat
Prc


From Liberation 09/02/2010